More on clustering... »
PHILIP STORRY - JUN 4, 2007 (02:40:28 PM)
Shortly after I put my article on clustering up, Nathan dropped by with an excellent point...
You don't HAVE to have a second network card for a Domino cluster.
It's recommended. Advised. IBM will probably give you a stern talking to if you phone them for support on a single-NIC cluster server. But it WILL work with one network card.
For production servers, you'd be nuts to think about such things. But for development and testing servers - providing you're not attempting realistic load testing - a single network card will suffice.
You might have noticed that the article had a certain wry look on how hard clustering is in Domino. I must admit that I purposefully complicated issues by putting the requirement for a second network card in there, because:
- If I didn't, Domino Clustering would look so simple that nobody could possibly take it seriously.
- Two cards is certainly best practice, and I don't want to be accused of deviating from best practice.
That having said, it looks like I forgot to put the command into the article where you tell the server to use the second network card... Whoops.
But then again, I can think of at least three ways you could set that option. Here's the rough overview, though:
- Add your second network card to the machine, and configure it under the OS with the correct settings.
- Add the port in the Domino Administrator Client, by going to the Server -< Port -< Setup... menu whilst in the Server -< Status tab
- In the Domino Directory, make sure that the port's network address is specified correctly in the server's Server Document - this is one of those rare occasions when using an IP address to explicitly declare the address is the correct thing to do!
- At the server console, type the following: set config SERVER_CLUSTER_DEFAULT_PORT=$portname, where $portname is the name of the port assigned to the second network card
- Restart the server
I did say Clustering was hard... ;-)
Why not update the article itself? Because it was intended more as humorous observation than a technical article, and tagged as such. I'll make a note in the comments, but nothing more...

