administration mode

The Not-So-Rapid Blog

The Future of Notes #4 - The M Word »

PHILIP STORRY - JUN 29, 2010 (10:48:59 PM)

This is part 4 in my Future of Notes series.

 

The M word. Marketing.

 

I really have had my reservations on this one. It's easy to criticise, especially as I'm treading into an area where I have NO EXPERIENCE whatsoever. 

 

I don't want to simply be whining, nor do I want to be one of the people asking for IBM to deliver the marketing equivalent of the moon on a stick. And I especially don't want to have this turn into some kind of strange passive-aggressive rant that lambasts IBM whilst frequently apologises to Ed Brill, who has been open and frank throughout. 

 

Believe me, I've written and re-written this one a few times in my head before committing it to a keyboard, let alone putting it out into the ether.

 

So, my thoughts on marketing generally are... Selling Notes as email is not healthy long-term, because it massively undersells the product.

 

Short term, however, it has been massively beneficial. The focus on email, in both IBM's development resource and in marketing terms, has put Notes firmly back in the frame.

 

But when you look closely, IBM's brief description of Notes doesn't actually sell it as just email. IBM's website for Notes refers to it as Collaboration Software.

 

WRONG.

 

Collaboration tools don't do email. They get email systems to do email for them. Collaboration tools' email prowess ends once the SMTP connection is dropped - something else does the delivery, storage and serving of email.

 

Take a look around the market, and you'll see that this is true. Collaboration solutions send emails, and sometimes slurp them via POP3. Nothing more.

 

Notes is more than email.

Notes is more than Collaboration.

Notes was, is, and will always be... Groupware.

 

Remember that term?

 

IBM's long-term direction for Notes should be to move Notes back to a place where it defines its own category. Where reviewers looking at it as email cannot forget that it's more than email. Where reviewers looking at it as an application platform cannot forget that it provides email too.

In some cases, that additional capability is a weakness. Usually, the acronym "SaaS" is seen in those cases...

But everywhere else, this is an advantage.

 

In fact, SaaS is a huge problem for us. I suspect that SaaS will be a "race to the bottom" that threatens all Collaboration and Email software equally.

Which is why the value of Notes, in being both email and applications, must be pressed.

 

That is all I'll say on marketing, as I've already vastly overstepped the mark that is drawn by my experience and (lack of) education in the subject.

BOOKMARK THIS CONTENT
del.icio.us technorati digg Furl YahooMyWeb Reddit NewsVine

Comments: 4

COMMENT: ERIC MACK emailhomepage

JUN 29, 2010 - 11:38:12 PM

comment » Well said. I would add to this a marketing saying that I learned from Zig Ziglar; "Features tell, Benefits SELL" in the early days of Notes, what Lotus/IBM sold were the benefits of collaboration and information and knowledge management. Lately, it seems that the emphasis is more on features. Companies don't buy features; they buy benefits that they believe those features will deliver.

I could stand to follow this advice with my own product - it's easy to get distracted into a feature comparison, when we should be looking at a benefits comparison. «

COMMENT: BILL DORGE email

JUN 30, 2010 - 03:47:16 AM

comment » I left a comment on Ed's blog the other day saying, sell it like you wrote it yesterday! If you were to ask almost anyone outside the Lotus community about Notes, your more than likely to get a look of "what?" or they will talk about how they had to use that at their old job, version 4 or 5 most likely.

Lotus Domino/Notes 8.5.x is so much more advanced than even version 7, we should have relaunched the product. Although it's backward compatible to version 1, it's not the same.

I'm not a marketing or sales giant by no means, but it doesn't take a genius to figure out what we have isn't working, time for something new. John Head released the study PSC did, Question 3 is the one that stuck out to me, trusted resouces. How do we build those personal referrals, how do we get customers telling their peers about Notes/Domino and how they use it.

I know it's something that I need to develop also, have to give that one some thought, could make an interesting session at Lotusphere.

Bill «

COMMENT: PHILIP STORRY emailhomepage

JUN 30, 2010 - 13:59:30

comment » @1 Eric,

That sounds like good advice.

No idea how to do it though. This is why I don't work in marketing! 18 «

COMMENT: PHILIP STORRY emailhomepage

JUN 30, 2010 - 14:03:44

comment » @2 Bill,

Sell it like you wrote it yesterday - I like that.

It's in tune with what I'm saying, which is that IBM needs to focus on the whole of Notes/Domino and its benefits (Thanks Eric!), not on just one part.

As you rightly point out, we all know the benefits of Notes/Domino, but most people may never find them.

I doubt I'll get to Lotusphere, but I look forward to downloading the slides from your session at some point in the future! 18 «

CREATE A NEW COMMENT
required field
required field HTML is not allowed. Hyperlinks will automatically be converted.
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30